Days before the start of Congress’s ordinary session period, Transparencia Mexicana called for a General Public Procurement Law that would establish common rules for purchasing and contracting across Mexico’s federal and state governments.
The organization identified more than 120 different public procurement procedures across the country — a regulatory patchwork that makes it difficult for small and medium-sized businesses to participate, creating barriers for historically excluded economic actors seeking to compete for government contracts.
Presenting the proposal, Eduardo Bohórquez, Executive Director of Transparencia Mexicana, said that “beyond controlling corruption in public procurement, the country needs to see it as an opportunity to bring new economic actors into the provision of goods and services for government.”
At the federal level alone, procurement and public works spending exceeds two trillion pesos a year. That volume represents not only a significant anti-corruption risk, but also an opportunity to build new productive supply chains, expand competition, and bring more businesses into the public procurement market.
Transparencia Mexicana reported that it is working with about a dozen civil society organizations from across the country to build the first national database of comparative prices for the health, security, education, and energy and transportation sectors.
The tool will make it possible to compare how the same good or service is procured across the federal government and state governments, helping identify price differences and contracting patterns relevant to preventing and detecting corruption risks.
The organization said it will present further details of the proposal in the coming weeks and will seek dialogue with the executive and legislative branches to advance a national discussion on a General Public Procurement Law.
Transparencia Mexicana Calls for Mandatory Disclosure of Cryptoassets and Offshore Accounts for Officials Elected in 2027
Mexico City, August 11, 2026. Following an in-depth analysis of corruption cases in Mexico over the past decade, Transparencia Mexicana (which has long advocated for stronger public integrity systems in the country) is calling for a revision of asset and interest disclosure forms to strengthen government and civil society oversight of digital and cryptoassets. Recognizing both how illegal proceeds of corruption are concealed today and how criminal networks operate, Transparencia Mexicana is also proposing a review of how public officials…
La probabilidad de ser sancionado por faltas administrativas graves: 7.1%
Un balance del trabajo de los Órganos de Fiscalización Superior y los Tribunales de Justicia Administrativa en México, 2017-2025. Hay una diferencia entre que exista una ley y que la ley funcione. Desde 2017, con la puesta en marcha del Sistema Nacional Anticorrupción, las Entidades de Fiscalización Superior (EFS) investigan casos de responsabilidades administrativas graves y pueden turnarlos a los Tribunales de Justicia Administrativa (TJA) para que los sancionen. Transparencia Mexicana sistematizó todos los Informes de Presunta Responsabilidad Administrativa (IPRA)…
Los efectos públicos de las contrataciones privadas.
Las recientes inundaciones en varios municipios conurbados de la Ciudad de México provocaron protestas vecinales, conversaciones públicas con autoridades municipales y cuestionamientos a la empresa concesionaria de una de las vías primarias de comunicación sobre quién debía responder por la infraestructura y las afectaciones generadas. El tema no es nuevo. Tampoco exclusivo de la zona conurbada de la Ciudad de México. A lo largo y ancho del país, los servicios concesionados a un particular son objeto de controversia en sectores…